Posts Tagged ‘nc’

Durham and Charlotte: Don’t forget to vote tomorrow!

North Carolinians: if you’re in Durham or Charlotte, don’t forget to vote tomorrow!

Here’s the sample ballot from the Durham County Board of Elections:
http://www.co.durham.nc.us/departments/elec/2009_Election/Ballots/Election/Durham%20%20Sample%20%28WM%29%201.pdf

In Durham’s Ward II race, GoLiberty endorses Matt Drew: http://electmattdrew.org/

Here’s the link to look up your sample ballot in Charlotte:
http://www.meckboe.org/AddressSearch.aspx

In Charlotte’s city council race, GoLiberty endorses Travis Wheat: http://www.electwheat.com/

If you’re not sure what ward or precinct you’re in, look up your voter registration at the following link, and click the “My Districts” link at the bottom of your search results to see all your municipal information:
http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/VoterLookup.aspx

Need to know where to vote? After you look up your voter registration above, it should tell you where to go vote. If you want to double-check, click the “My Districts” information to get your precinct information, and check one of the following links:
DURHAM: http://www.co.durham.nc.us/departments/elec/Polling_Locations.html
CHARLOTTE: http://www.meckboe.org/PollingLocations.aspx

Politics 101, September 2009

New Raleigh just posted this announcement about Politics 101, a series of forums featuring local candidates for Raleigh and Wake County government offices. I heard about it, and if I can fit it into my schedule, I hope to attend a few of these and post GoLiberty reports after each:
http://www.newraleigh.com/articles/archive/city-politicians-stump-at-101-in-september/

What would Dorothea do?

Before I dived too deep in my investigation into the Friends of Dorothea Dix Park (aka Dix 306) and the so-called "world-class park" plans for Raleigh, I asked myself, "What would Dorothea think of this?"

To help answer this question, I read significant portions of a detailed biography called Voice for the Mad: The Life of Dorothea Dix (The Free Press, 1995). Author David Gollaher is an admitted fan of Dix’s nationwide activism in the mid-nineteenth century on behalf of those with a wide range of mental disorders. Gollaher thus details not only the historical details of her mission, but the emotional reflections in writings from her and others who were acquainted with her. It is clear throughout the book that Dix saw a blatant and inexcusable discrepancy between basic human rights and the mistreatment of those in the care of some mental institutions in the country.

The woman…
Dorothea Dix hailed from Massachusetts, was devoted to her Unitarian faith, and was a teacher and author of children’s books before an illness struck her in her 30s. During refuge and recovery across the Atlantic in the 1830s, she had her first exposure to new approaches to treating the mentally ill. This included modeling the mental institution after a familiar domestic environment "that would redeem the insane and, in turn, reunite them with the family of humankind." The promise alone of new cures was an inspiration that helped Dix herself find new hope and purpose.  This set her in motion to lead institution reform across the U.S.  Gollaher writes, "She had adopted a new criterion of humanitarianism and in the process discovered unanticipated reasons to be interested in government power."

At the time Dix was visiting facilities and formulating her message, many states and regions had implemented insane asylums to separate the mentally ill from society. In most cases, these asylums were a public safety measure more than treatment effort, and "treatment" too often consisted of torture if not also subhuman living conditions. In North Carolina in particular, Dix observed the harmful affects and inconsistencies in using common jails for those who committed violent crimes as a result of mental illness.

When Dix found her voice in her memorials and her presentations to state legislatures, many states followed her passionate pleas with much-needed action. It was 1848 when Dix toured North Carolina’s asylums and wrote her North Carolina Memorial. In it, she states, "I am the Hope of the poor crazed beings who pine in the cells, and stalls, and cages, and waste rooms of your poor-houses… I am the Revelation of hundreds of wailing, suffering creatures."

The NC state legislature…
In 1844, Governor John Motley Morehead had strongly recommended that NC build institutions for the mentally ill, blind, and deaf; but no legislation followed his recommendation. After her pleas to the state four years later, Dix adapted words from the Christian Gospels to admonish the state for not treating its mentally ill as it would want to be treated.

As in other states, Dix encouraged North Carolina to put the financial resources from its people into the treatment of the mentally ill. She suggested it would not be an onerous financial burden to the people of NC, and would cost "a few dollars and dimes, gathered from each citizen," like "a particular rent charge upon the great family of mankind." For libertarians, this suggestion sounds socialist; but consider also that her own words did not indicate explicity that taxes should be levied for such a purpose, though her legislative audience would naturally think in those terms.

Typically, an issue lobbied to members the legislature becomes a political target for one side or the other on the floor.  Such was the case with Dix’s pleas for the mentally ill in NC as she was dismissed by the NC Whigs, but found support from John W. Ellis and the Democratic majority in what was then the North Carolina House of Commons. The result was a bill to build and commence operations of an asylum on a site of at least 100 acres, with water and a list of supplies that would fulfill the purpose of the institution as a comparable domestic environment to that of Dix’s vision.

Neither Whigs nor Democrats were inclined to raise NC taxes to cover the proposed cost of $100,000 for the asylum. Likewise, they questioned why a woman from Massachusetts was intent on lobbying for a cause in North Carolina. After the bill faced almost certain defeat on the floor, an impassioned speech by James C. Dobbin, who would later serve as speaker of the House of Commons, provided a personal testament that changed its course. Dobbins had just returned from his wife’s funeral in Fayetteville, and he recounted Dix’s generous company and care to his sick wife while they were both guests at the Mansion House Hotel in Raleigh. He stated that Mrs. Dobbins’ dying request was that her husband do whatever he could to pass the bill for Dix’s asylum. Dobbins’ eleventh hour effort was the emotional movement needed to pass the bill 101 to 10, though not without an additional proposal to reduce a land tax and poll tax that had been the original means to finance the effort.

The NC legislature only approved $7,000 for the next fiscal year to select land and start planning, and they attempted to move forward with a "pay-as-you-go" basis that relied solely on the earmarked revenues for the asylum. Though not the full extent of what she wanted in NC, Dix marked it as a success. It was Governor William A. Graham who convinced the legislature to name the site of the asylum after her, calling it Dix Hill. A century later, it would be renamed to Dorothea Dix Hospital, continuing to honor her advocacy for the mentally ill.  The North Carolina State Medical Society formed in the following year (1849), and the asylum itself was finished and opened in 1856.

The land…
The focus of my "Dix 306" series is on the land that still currently houses the original hospital as the state continues its plans toward closing the facility and selling that land, most likely to an anxiously awaiting City of Raleigh.   As a result, for brevity’s sake, I will skip the rich hospital history and simply state the following key aspects of land allocation and use throughout the history of Dix Hill:

* The original land that comprised Dix Hill was 182 acres on two tracts purchased from Maria Hunter Hall and Sylvester Smith for $1,944.63.

* Dix clearly indicated that by using large tracts of land for asylums, patients in recovery could work the land and employ its resources as part of their recovery effort. This was consistent with the research on mental illness and recovery that she learned about in Europe.

* When the state changed some of its laws in 1899, the name of the asylum became The State Hospital in Raleigh, and the first voluntary admissions lead to a call to increase capacity. This resulted in the creation of an adjoining epileptic colony on 1,155 acres of land, bringing the land total to 1337 acres.

* In 1974, after years of changing laws and provisions by the state, and changing its name to Dorothea Dix Hospital, the facility was its largest size to date: 2,354 acres of land, including three lakes and 1,300 acres for the farm. At that time, there were 282 buildings equipped to handle 2,756 patients.

* Over time, the state has sold off or reallocated the acreage for other purposes, such as creating the Farmer’s Market and generously expanding North Carolina State University.

* As of today, Dix Hill is 306 acres of state-owned land which is still allocated to the North Carolina Division of Mental Health.

Today, mental health professionals in North Carolina, and advocates for the mentally ill across the state, say that the North Carolina mental healthcare system is in a crisis, and that shrinking the system is not the answer.

So… what would Dorothea do?

I predict she would admonish the state for ignoring the problems in its mental healthcare system, and for not ensuring behavioral treatments were applied such that patients could eventually return to be productive and self-sufficient.  Most of all, I think she would be glad that the hospital she pleaded for 160 years ago was still standing and operating, and she would personally fight in front of the General Assembly to keep it open and in service to the mentally ill of North Carolina.

I also think she would leverage the media to scold the City of Raleigh for its vulture-like hovering, waiting to devour the remains if the state leaves it behind.  For all their assuring words that they intend to give the hospital the time it needs to remove themselves from the land, she would look past the promises and find the allies she needed to fight city development  and keep the hospital open.

Sources:
Voice for the Mad: The Life of Dorothea Dix by David Gollaher, The Free Press, 1995.
"History of Dorothea Dix Hospital," NC MHDDSAS website (link)

Tax Day Aftermath

I attended the second of the two tax-day protests in downtown Raleigh yesterday. (I was still finishing my sparkly poster during the first one. ;-) I took about 100 tea bags with me with a two-sided note attached: a quote from Thomas Jefferson on one side, and a quick LPNC.org promotion on the other. With what WRAL reports as about 1500 people at the Capitol Building, though, I ran out of those pretty quick! It was a great multi-partisan turnout.

Naturally, as in every protest movement, you have your folks with misspelled signs, personal-attack posters, and off-color messages that tend to embarrass the core protesters. Unfortunately, too many of them ended up with a microphone in front of their face. I facepalmed a few times listening to the media coverage last night and this morning.

Consequently, as many liberals saw the tea parties as a protest against their beloved Obama, some individuals in the media acted as if we had no right to object to anything the government was currently doing and dismissed the protesters with incredulous sarcasm. Personally, I’m glad they didn’t dismiss 2008’s large Obama/Hope movement with the same disdain, or we’d have McCain and Palin in charge and getting closer to an unreasonable marriage of Christianity and State.

Personally, as a Libertarian, it was frustrating to see the GOP and Fox News so heavily involved. Why? Well, the Libertarian Party has been doing tax day protests every year nationwide since it formed in the 1970s. Having the GOP and Fox News coming out as if leading the way in these protests is almost hypocritical on their part being that the GOP leadership is much to blame for our current economic state. I feel like the intelligent, libertarian message was drowned out by those targeting Obama and his administration… and I still hate that I ran out of my information-tagged tea bags.

The bottom line of the protest for me, every year, has been that taxpayer apathy is a dangerous fuel to government’s power. Since the federal income tax was made permanent with the Revenue Act of 1913, and the coinciding Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, citizens of the U.S. have resigned themselves to assuming any “big” solution (involving money they can’t imagine ever having, let alone spending) requires a government solution rather than a big movement in the private sector.

Instead of looking to their communities to come together, they march to their legislature with outcries of “We’re entitled to X, so use our tax money to give us X.” By taking on this attitude, and electing people to office inclined to cater to them, they resign more of their money, and more of their personal choices, to the hands of the government.

Is there really a “greater good consensus” we can all agree on so much so that we can leave it in government’s hands to make our decisions for us?

Even computers don’t all agree on everything. ;-)

This disturbing attitude of helplessness and entitlement is in direct conflict with the nature of our people defined in the original U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It is my sincere hope that logic, reason, rational thought, and skepticism will prevail in time in government so that we will not have to bleed in revolution.

Who Stands to Gain from Dix 306?

Naturally, when I hear about new public projects in the City of Raleigh, I am skeptical about the need to use public (tax) funds for that purpose. Some of the questions I usually ask are:
* How much tax money will be spent up front?
* How much tax money is required for ongoing expenses (such as maintenance and staffing)?
* Where do these numbers come from (such as urban development studies and financial impact studies)?

With that in mind, one of the things that has concerned me about the “Dix 306″ movement is the possible misrepresentation of the goals and potential value of their so-called “world-class park” to the citizens of Raleigh. This prompted me to dive into Dix306.org and the public records for the non-profit organization Friends of Dorothea Dix Park (FDDP) to learn more about the organization and compare that against what we know and don’t know about the people who stand to gain from this park development project.

If you have one of those “DIX 306″ signs in your yard, and you have not taken the time to consider all of the facts behind the Friends of Dorothea Dix Park, I encourage you to read my series of posts on this topic:

What Would Dorothea Do?

In other upcoming posts, I will…
* Summarize the details of the Friends of Dix Park White Paper, including the projected costs, the use of tax-increment financing to fund the project, and the entities who stand to profit from this plan
* Review the 2006 and 2007 tax forms for the FDDP to see how the organization is running itself and who is getting paid
* Examine the list of executive director, officers, and board members to see how many would be impacted by the proposed TIF
* Study the property values of the individuals affected by the proposed TIF and compare those to the income levels of those who live on those properties
* Interview various individuals involved in, supporting, and opposing the Dix 306 plan, and post some of the transcripts of those interviews
* Compare other proposed plans’ projected costs and claimed benefits against those proposed by the FDDP

If you have any information or tips that you think may help, feel free to post a comment here and I will follow up. (My email is not working properly at the moment, and I’m still investigating that issue.)

Return top