Archive for March, 2010

Candidate Questionnaire: Coalition for North Carolina Jobs

The following are the questions and responses I submitted for the 2010 candidate questionnaire from the Coalition for North Carolina Jobs. This survey did not prompt for commentary, so I just circled the answers as you see here.

1. [Coalition for NC Jobs explanation omitted.]
If elected, would you oppose or support collective bargaining for government employees?

Oppose.

2.  [Coalition for NC Jobs explanation omitted.]
If elected, would you oppose or support maintaining North Carolina as a Right to Work State?

Support.

3. [Coalition for NC Jobs explanation omitted.]
The Coalition for North Carolina Jobs opposes legislation that would require local governments to collect association dues. If elected, would you oppose or support this type of legislation?

Oppose.

4. [Coalition for NC Jobs explanation omitted.]
The Coalition for North Carolina Jobs believes the protections provided for peace officers in current law are adequate, that the additional bureaucracy created by this legislation is unnecessarily expensive to the taxpayers, and opposes The Peace Officers’ Bill of Rights legislation. If elected, would you oppose or support this type of legislation?

Oppose.

5. [Coalition for NC Jobs explanation omitted.]
If elected, would you oppose or support legislation that would make it more difficult to discipline non-certified school employees and given them even more employment protections than most teachers and other professional staff?

Oppose.

Candidate Questionnaire: North Carolina Association of Educators (NCAE)

The following are the questions and responses I submitted for the 2010 candidate questionnaire from the North Carolina Association of Educators (NCAE).

1. What are your top three priorities for public educating in North Carolina?

(a) Parental choice

(b) Reconsidering the construction and high priority of the NC Standard Course of Study

(c) Expansion and enhancement of vocational education

2. It’s estimated that K-12 public education will lose 3, 700 jobs for the 2010-2011 school year, in addition to the 2,400 jobs lost in the 2009-2010 school year. It has been suggested that additional cuts to teaching positions are necessary to balance the budget because 61% of the K-12 budget is personnel. Do you support using educators to balance the budget?

No. While personnel costs are usually the biggest expense for a business, there are many other ways to balance the budget that should be considered first.

3. Will you make it priority to fund the teacher salary schedule, as well as longevity, in 2010-11?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

Yes. Though I generally support reducing costs of public services, I don’t think teachers should be undercompensated.

4. Would you support full involvement and approval by affected educators in the development and implementation of any alternative compensation models?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

Yes. The salary model should provide merit based on teacher performance, not on student performance, in my opinion as a former teacher.

5. Will you support a salary schedule for teacher assistants based on their education and years of experience?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

Yes. I support reasonable salary schedules based on experience, as in the teachers’ salary schedule, though compensation based on educational achievement should be limited to what is reasonable for the position.

6. Will you support the continuation of a fully paid individual health care coverage for active and retired educators and state employees?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

No. I would like to see other options on the table, such as a health savings program or tiered choices, before I would support any one option.

7. Would you support an increase in the employer contribution to the N.C. Retirement System to 6.71% of payroll in 2010 and to commit to a full funding of the plan in the future to sustain TSERS retirement benefits in the future?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

The “cost of living adjustment” should be applied to salaries so that the retirement portion is naturally adjusted at the same time.

8. UNC funding has grown by 46% over the last five years, and recent reports indicate that non-classroom personnel within higher education has grown the fastest during this time. Would you support cutting non-essential programs and positions at the UNC System before cutting classroom services to North Carolina students in K-12?

No… not necessarily. Each individual position and program should be weighed against all positions and programs across the board before funding is reduced for any.

9. Would you support continuing to use the Teacher Working Conditions Survey to analyze what is working and not working in each of the state’s schools AND to provide funding to work to resolve these problems?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

Yes, but… While the survey offers important feedback about working conditions, it should not be the only tool used in determining funding.

10. Would you support maintaining the state funding for the Teacher Cadet program at the current level?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

No. While I enthusiastically support the program as an expansion of vocational education, I do not support it as a systematic recruiting program.

11. What steps would you take to reform the state tax structure in order to generate the revenue needed to fund a quality public school system and other needed services?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

I support the gradual move toward community schools funded on an individual or local level, independent of the state tax structure.

12. Do you oppose the use of tax credits, vouchers, and/or any use of public money for private K-12 schools?
[NCAE's explanation omitted.]

No. One of my priorities for schools is to increase choice for parents. Programs like these offer these choices with little impact per student.

13. Are there any additional comments you would like to make?

For more about my positions, especially for managing municipal growth and re-evaluating the role of public schools and the NCSCS, please visit by Website at GoLiberty.net.

Beitler Volunteers Meeting Wednesday

If you’re looking to volunteer for Mike Beitler’s state-wide Libertarian campaign, come out to Durham tomorrow night!

March 24, 2010 at 7 PM
Satisfactions, 905 W Main St, Durham, NC
For more details visit  http://www.meetup.com/Beitlervolunteers/calendar/12789148/

I’d like to encourage my own campaign volunteers to take part, too. I envision that there is a lot we can do to help each other campaigning in Wake County.

Stef on PFP Movement Radio Friday 3/12

Mike Shanklin invited me to a 15-minute interview on Friday’s episode of the Peace Freedom and Prosperity Movement Radio blogcast. I’ll be on there about 8:50 PM answering questions about the campaign, and I hope I’ll effectively avoid my tendency to ramble.

You can find the PFP Movement Radio broadcast online from this link starting at 8 PM:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pfpmovementradio

NC Civitas Makes Disturbing Stance on Marriage

As part of the John W. Pope Civitas Institute article “20 Change For 2010,” Jessica Custer suggests that because NC is the “only southern state” without a “marriage defense amendment,” and that Civitas polls suggest that “two-thirds” of North Carolinians support such an amendment, that our government should add such an amendment to our own state’s constitution. You can read the article here: http://www.nccivitas.org/media/publication-archive/policy-brief/20-changes-2010-defense-marriage-act

In response, I wrote the following:

After reading Jessica Custer’s article “20 Changes For 2010: Defense of Marriage Act” (March 8), I wanted to express my disappointment. I had hoped an organization like Civitas, with mostly reasonable approaches to our state’s problems, would not assume it is within the realm of state government to reward or punish any specific group of individuals for personal decisions that do not encroach on the rights of other individuals.

As in many other states, North Carolina’s marriage laws were established as a means of allowing the state to discriminate against any group it chooses with respect to the legal marriage contract. These laws are antiquated and an egregious affront to liberty and individual rights. The remedy to solving any marriage “issue” in government policy is to get rid of the laws altogether, not to amend them.

Furthermore, I feel a deep sadness that anyone, especially members of Civitas, would want to amend our country’s or state’s constitution in an attempt to enforce a social or moral stance which is not within the realm of government to enforce.

Individuals can still make legal agreements with regards to important life decisions. They should continue to have the right to make such contracts and to have those contracts legally binding. However, the definition of “marriage” is best left to its original jurisdiction: individuals and religious groups.

Thank you for your time. I hope that the ideas of liberty will prevail at Civitas and that you will reconsider the role of government in social and moral issues.

Web Site Updated, First Volunteer Meeting Set

I have spent time today carefully reworking the Web site content so I could make it live today. Not only are the Donate, Voter Info, and Volunteer pages updated, but I’ve posted my priority issues and stances on the Issues page. The campaign theme is set: “It’s about choice.”

I’ve scheduled the first volunteer meeting, mostly an organizational meeting for March 14, 2010, at 3 PM. Supporters are encouraged to attend! The agenda, directions, and other details are posted at the volunteer mailing list/Google group here:
http://groups.google.com/group/goliberty/browse_thread/thread/2a0712cbc6995e1c

NOTE: apologies if the Web site seems slow occasionally; we’re working to fix it ASAP

Return top